Lemon law attorneys not necessary, but they could make a difference
Since their introduction in the early 1980’s, thousands of Americans have benefitted from the auto lemon laws enacted in all fifty states. The statutes were passed in order to help consumers with problems associated with habitually broken or defective automobiles, and on the whole, they have been successful. The system, as it stands now, is designed so that consumers with problem vehicles can address the problem themselves. But there are times when it may not only be useful to hire an attorney, but times when having a lawyer may make all the difference in the world.
Here are some examples of how hiring an attorney can help you with a lemon law case:
- They can shorten the process - There are three times in the process when a manufacturer may offer a refund or replacement: when you first contact them about the problem, after you win an arbitration case, or after you win a lawsuit. Some manufacturers may feel more likely to win their case if you do not have legal representation. Having an attorney on your side, especially one with a good track record of handling lemon law cases, may inspire the manufacturer to settle your case sooner, rather than later.
- Arbitration favors the manufacturer - All of the major auto companies make arbitration available for consumers with problem vehicles. The system, on paper, appears to be fair and impartial, but it often isn’t. By some estimates, manufacturers win up to 90% of arbitration cases. That shouldn’t be a surprise; arbitrators of manufacturer-supported programs are paid by the manufacturers. Many consumers give up their cases after losing in arbitration, but consumers who follow up losing arbitration cases with lawsuits often win them. Having an attorney, especially after losing arbitration, is vital.
|