|
Should the vehicle qualify, the manufacturer should offer one of the following as a resolution to the problem:
- A replacement with a comparable vehicle of the same model with the same features as the defective vehicle.
- A refund of the purchase price. This refund should include the full price of the vehicle including sales taxes, registration and licensing fees and any incidental government charges.
- The owner is permitted to choose between a refund or replacement. Should the manufacturer decline or refuse to offer compensation, the owner may evoke the lemon law statute.
While the warranty period covered by the law is for the first 12 months of ownership, the owner of the vehicle has 18 months from the date of purchase to apply for relief under the provisions of the law. Nevada requires owners to submit to arbitration, a process which tends to favor manufacturers. Should the vehicle owner prevail during the arbitration hearing or should the manufacturer fail to respond to the complaint, the owner will be entitled to relief. Relief will consist of either a suitable replacement vehicle or a refund of the purchase price along with taxes and license fees. This restitution is subject to an allowance for wear, tear and use of the vehicle.
That’s it in a nutshell. As we have noted, the Nevada lemon law is a relatively weak one. Furthermore, we were unable to find any information about this law on either the Website of the State of Nevada or the Website of Nevada’s Attorney General’s office.
If you are going through difficulties with your automobile, sport utility vehicle or van, you may find that you need an attorney. LegalMatch can help locate an experienced attorney for you in your area. Confidentiality is assured, all attorneys are licensed, and there is no charge to inquire.
|